Flores v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that there A is no fundamental right to receive probation @
• rejecting defendant’s disparate treatment argument because accepting it would lead to unintended consequences better left for the legislature to decide
• rejecting defendant’s disparate treatment argument because accepting it would lead to unintended consequences better left for the legislature to decide
• stating that there Ais no fundamental right to receive probation@
• examining the constitutionality of a trial court = s community supervision decision
• “[T]here is no fundamental right to receive probation; it is within the discretion of the trial court to determine whether an individual defendant is entitled to probation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Speth v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-12-01· cited 552×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-12-11· cited 292×
• Zarco v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-12-21· cited 103×
• Acosta v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2005-03-03· cited 89×
• State v. Robinson
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2016-06-29· cited 78×
• In re M.A.C.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1999-07-08· cited 60×
• Sullivan v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1999-02-12· cited 54×
• Pena v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-04-08· cited 50×
• Ex Parte Quintana
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2010-03-24· cited 48×
• Bath v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1997-08-14· cited 39×
• Kesaria v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-10-12· cited 38×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-06-24· cited 21×
• Holcomb v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2004-09-10· cited 18×
• Barker v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-02-15· cited 18×
• Ex Parte Dangelo
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-02-24· cited 18×
• Perkins v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1999-11-30· cited 11×
• Ex Parte Chamberlain
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-30· cited 5×
• Calderon-Palomino v. Nichols
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-12-20· cited 5×
• Freeman, Corey Thomas v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2013-09-10· cited 5×
• Rodriguez v. Quarterman
  S.D. Texas· 2007-10-09· cited 1×

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 7,112×
• Hernandez v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
• San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
  Supreme Court· 1973-04-23· cited 3,699×
• Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
  Supreme Court· 1971-03-08· cited 3,596×
• Meyer v. Nebraska
  Supreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 3,363×
• Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. Feeney
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 2,187×
• Loving v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 2,147×
• McCleskey v. Kemp
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-08· cited 2,038×
• Nordlinger v. Hahn
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 1,649×
• Frontiero v. Richardson
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 1,487×
• Hirabayashi v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1943-06-21· cited 921×
• Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 918×
• Hernandez v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1954-05-03· cited 774×
• Clark v. Jeter
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 679×
• Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, Denver
  Supreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 667×
• Palmore v. Sidoti
  Supreme Court· 1984-04-25· cited 491×
• Hector GARCIA, Etc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alton v. W. GLOOR Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
  Fifth Circuit· 1980-05-22· cited 217×
• McClenan v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-12-07· cited 216×
• Casarez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-12-13· cited 112×
• King v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1989-10-10· cited 96×