Skip to main content

Acosta v. State

Citations

  • 160 S.W.3d 204
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 1729
  • 2005 WL 503199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for new trial on ineffective assistance claim because trial court was free to disbelieve appellant’s assertions when appellant’s testimony was in sharp conflict with trial counsel’s testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dauphinot, Gardner, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.