Flewallen v. Faulkner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether a disclosure was curative should not be decided on a motion to dismiss where there is a “substantial question[ ] of fact” regarding the scope or time limit of a class
• applying evidentiary burdens set forth in Grünewald to require prosecution to show direct evidence of (1) an original express agreement to conceal the conspiracy and (2) an overt act that furthered the conspiratorial purpose
• officer’s resignation from corporation is prima facie withdrawal from criminal conspiracy absent some conduct in furtherance of conspiracy subsequent to resignation
• “a district court may decertify a class if it appears that the requirements of Rule 23 are not in fact met”
• requirement of membership in local trade association for access to multiple listing service operated by the association does not, under rule of reason analysis, constitute antitrust violation
• “Class certification motions are not subject to the same standards as motions for dismissal for failure to state a claim or for summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Francis J. McQueeney v. Wilmington Trust Company, Trustee, and Anndep Steamship Corporation
  Third Circuit· 1985-12-26· cited 226×
• Barry G. Lew, M.D. v. Kona Hospital
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-05-13· cited 213×
• John A. Healey, Michael S. Press v. Chelsea Resources, Ltd., Dominick & Dominick Securities, Inc. And Dominick & Dominick, Incorporated
  Second Circuit· 1991-10-18· cited 163×
• United States v. Jannotti, Harry P. Schwartz, George X. Appeal of Harry P. Jannotti, in No. 83-1093. Appeal of George X. Schwartz, in No. 83-1094
  Third Circuit· 1984-03-20· cited 162×
• Michael McCarthy Arthur Waskow v. Richard G. Kleindienst
  D.C. Circuit· 1984-08-17· cited 159×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,010 Fred H. Harmsen v. C. Arnholt Smith
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-12-01· cited 138×
• United States v. Mitchell Antar, in 94-5228. United States of America v. Eddie Antar, in 94-5230
  Third Circuit· 1995-04-12· cited 122×
• United States v. De Peri
  Third Circuit· 1985-12-06· cited 122×
• United States v. Joseph Kelly
  Third Circuit· 1990-01-17· cited 119×
• United States v. Matthew Edward Lothian
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-10-05· cited 99×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-10-08· cited 89×
• United States v. DiPasquale
  Third Circuit· 1984-07-31· cited 82×
• United States v. Mohamed Salim, A/K/A Abdul Qazi, A/K/A Mohamed Ali
  Second Circuit· 1988-08-24· cited 78×
• In Re Ames Department Stores Inc. Stock Litigation
  Second Circuit· 1993-04-02· cited 71×
• United States v. Jessica M. Lofton
  Tenth Circuit· 1985-11-12· cited 65×
• United States v. John F. Dunn, Jr.
  First Circuit· 1985-03-29· cited 58×
• United States v. Rosa
  Third Circuit· 1989-12-08· cited 58×
• L.E. Eguia v. Joyce Tompkins
  Fifth Circuit· 1985-04-08· cited 49×
• United States v. Aloyisius Juodakis
  First Circuit· 1987-12-10· cited 43×
• United States v. Chambers
  Sixth Circuit· 1991-09-10· cited 41×