In Re Ames Department Stores Inc. Stock Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an investor's reliance need not be envisioned to give rise to liability under S 10(b) and Rule 10b-5
• holding that an investor's reliance need not be envisioned to give rise to liability underS 10(b) and Rule 10b-5
• holding that in dismissing a securities fraud case, the district court erred, in part, by failing to consider press releases as made “in connection with” stockholders’ purchases
• explaining that the in-connection-with requirement is met “when the fraud alleged is that the plaintiff bought or sold a security in reliance on misrepresentations as to its value”
• involving the public dissemination of false information in publicly filed offering documents, press releases, and research reports
• involving the public dissemination of false information in publicly filed offering documents, press releases, and research reports

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).