Skip to main content
· 10/18/1991

John A. Healey, Michael S. Press v. Chelsea Resources, Ltd., Dominick & Dominick Securities, Inc. And Dominick & Dominick, Incorporated

Citations

  • 947 F.2d 611
  • 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 139
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 24947

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a court’s assessment of a client's credibility may provide a basis for an award of sanctions against the client himself
  • noting it must be \patently clear that a claim ha[d] absolutely no chance of success\
  • noting it must be “patently clear that a claim ha[d] absolutely no chance of success”
  • noting it must be “patently clear that a claim ha[d] absolutely no chance of success”
  • noting it must be “patently clear that a claim ha[d] absolutely no chance of success”
  • noting it must be “patently clear that a claim ha[d] absolutely no chance of success”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Kearse, Stanton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.