Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2/28/2008

Jones v. State

Citations

943 A.2d 1
178 Md. App. 454
2008 Md. App. LEXIS 21

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “No Trespassing” sign did not preclude knock-and-talk by police and noting that “courts have been very consistent in concluding that no trespassing signs, in and of themselves, do not make a police officer’s entry on property unlawful”
holding that “No Trespassing” sign did not preclude knock-and-talk by police and noting that “courts have been very consistent in concluding that no trespassing signs, in and of themselves, do not make a police officer‟s entry on property unlawful”
finding that “No Trespassing” signs may be considered as part of the totality of the circumstances
finding that ―No Trespassing‖ signs may be considered as part of the totality of the circumstances
“For Fourth Amendment purposes, appellant could not have had a reasonable expectation that the „No Trespassing‟ sign would or should prevent visitors with a legitimate purpose from walking to the front door, including police officers in furtherance of an investigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eyler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.