Skip to main content
· 12/30/2009

Stokeling v. State

Citations

  • 985 A.2d 175
  • 189 Md. App. 653
  • 2009 Md. App. LEXIS 196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that dog “alert to the Chrysler gave the police probable cause to search it for illegal drugs”
  • examining the reasonableness of transporting a suspect to the police station in order to conduct a strip search incident to arrest
  • “It is well established that an alert to a vehicle by a qualified drug-sniffing dog furnishes probable cause to perform a warrantless search of the vehicle.”
  • “The continued vitality of Wallace is questionable given the Supreme Court’s ultimate decision in Pringle.”
  • “The continued vitality of Wallace is questionable given the Supreme Court’s ultimate decision in Pringle.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eyler, Deborah, Graeff, Alpert, Paul

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.