Skip to main content

Fisher v. State

Citations

  • 379 S.W.2d 900
  • 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1018

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding confession may only be used when “freely and voluntarily made without having been induced by the expectation of any promised benefit.”
  • holding that the issue of the voluntariness of a confession should have been submitted to the jury when the defendant confessed to stealing property from his employer after his employer promised he would not press charges, call the police, or fire the defendant
  • to determine whether a confession is admissible when the defendant contends that the confession was influenced by a promise, test the degree of influence exerted.
  • decided under former law set out in Article 726
  • decided under former law set out in Article 726
  • decided under former law set out in article 726

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McDonald, Woodley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.