Skip to main content
· 5/22/1996

Ashcraft v. State

Citations

  • 918 S.W.2d 648
  • 1996 WL 120982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no abuse of discretion if the recantation testimony is of questionable weight and credibility and would probably not bring about a different result upon a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings and Vance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.