Skip to main content
· 8/16/2001

Bordman v. State

Citations

  • 56 S.W.3d 63

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • neither State nor the defendant raised issue regarding missing tape; court held that tape was unnecessary for resolution of appeal
  • neither State nor the defendant raised issue regarding missing tape; court held that tape was unnecessary for resolution of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cannon, Lee, Amidei

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.