Skip to main content

Freeman v. State

Citations

  • 723 S.W.2d 727
  • 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a statement of the status of the case in terms of the facts and law is not a coercive promise which taints the suspect's response
  • holding that a statement of the status of the case in terms of the facts and law is not a coercive promise which taints the suspect’s response
  • holding that a statement of the status of the case in terms of the facts and law is not a coercive promise which taints the suspect's response
  • where defendant was told that he could not be charged with death penalty under facts of the case, interrogators did not make promise or agreement but merely gave correct statement of status of case in terms of facts and law applicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Onion, Clinton, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.