Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/26/1986
Freeman v. State
Citations
- 723 S.W.2d 727
- 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 883
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a statement of the status of the case in terms of the facts and law is not a coercive promise which taints the suspect's response
- holding that a statement of the status of the case in terms of the facts and law is not a coercive promise which taints the suspect’s response
- holding that a statement of the status of the case in terms of the facts and law is not a coercive promise which taints the suspect's response
- where defendant was told that he could not be charged with death penalty under facts of the case, interrogators did not make promise or agreement but merely gave correct statement of status of case in terms of facts and law applicable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Onion, Clinton, Teague
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-12-04· cited 804×
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-10-27· cited 477×
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-03-27· cited 418×
- Coffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-10-12· cited 278×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-15· cited 201×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-10-18· cited 170×
- Jacobs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-04-11· cited 133×
- Williams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1997-06-04· cited 108×
- State v. CooperNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-11-03· cited 90×
- Perez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1991-10-10· cited 61×
- State v. AguilarCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-06-11· cited 57×
- In re D.W.L.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-02· cited 49×
- Atkins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-08-18· cited 42×
- LaSalle v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1996-05-21· cited 38×
- Wayne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-15· cited 31×
- Glover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-02-02· cited 28×
- In re C.M. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-09-21· cited 23×
- Barnes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-06-30· cited 22×
- Nuttall v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2002-10-11· cited 22×
- Winter v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1995-03-30· cited 22×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 2,626×
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,351×
- Hardesty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-02-08· cited 177×
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-01-05· cited 125×
- McMahon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-11-22· cited 123×
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1964-05-13· cited 92×
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-01-14· cited 89×
- Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-07-24· cited 44×
- Sherman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-18· cited 42×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-06-13· cited 33×
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-05-18· cited 28×
- Searcy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1890-05-14· cited 22×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-01-27· cited 13×
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1985-04-18· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.