· 1/6/2011
Feinberg v. RM ACQUISITION, LLC
Citations
- 629 F.3d 671
- 50 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1682
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 249
- 2011 WL 31857
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the plaintiff had “no practical alternative to suing” the successor
- “The proper defendant in a suit for benefits under an ERISA plan is ... normally the plan itself. ...”
- “The proper defendant in a suit for benefits under an ERISA plan is, in any event, normally the plan itself ... because the plan is the obligor.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Flaum, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.