Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 1/6/2011

Feinberg v. RM ACQUISITION, LLC

Citations

  • 629 F.3d 671
  • 50 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1682
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 249
  • 2011 WL 31857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the plaintiff had “no practical alternative to suing” the successor
  • “The proper defendant in a suit for benefits under an ERISA plan is ... normally the plan itself. ...”
  • “The proper defendant in a suit for benefits under an ERISA plan is, in any event, normally the plan itself ... because the plan is the obligor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Flaum, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.