Skip to main content
· 1/24/2014

Teamsters Local Union No. 705 v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC

Citations

  • 741 F.3d 819
  • 57 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1825
  • 2014 WL 265735
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 1476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Supreme Court has held that Congress intended ERISA’s comprehensive civil enforcement scheme to be exclusive.”
  • summarizing ERISA preemption of state-law remedies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Sykes, Randa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.