Skip to main content
· 10/24/1997

General Electric Capital Corporation v. Lease Resolution Corporation

Citations

  • 128 F.3d 1074
  • 47 Fed. R. Serv. 1177
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 29354
  • 1997 WL 661397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[i]n order for a fact to be judicially noticed, indisputa- bility is a prerequisite”
  • holding that district court could take judicial notice of undisputed fact in the public records to support 12(b)(6) motion
  • recognizing that a district court may take judicial notice of matters in the public record without converting a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment
  • holding that courts can take notice of matters of public record, including “orders, items appearing in the record of the case, and exhibits attached to the complaint.”
  • holding that constructive fraudulent transfer pleadings complied with Rule 9(b
  • noting that “[t]he most frequent use of judicial notice of ascertainable facts is in noticing the contents of court records” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eschbach, Flaum, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.