Farhang v. Kariminaser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘prejudgment interest may be awarded if: (1
• lack of ascertainability is a dispositive issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Precision Seed Cleaners v. Country Mutual Insurance
  D. Oregon· 2013-10-01· cited 33×
• Patton v. Mut. of Enumclaw Ins. Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-02-27· cited 8×
• Farhang v. Kariminaser
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-12-09· cited 6×
• Spaid v. 4-R Equipment, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-12· cited 3×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strader v. Grange Mutual Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-01-30· cited 56×
• Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-03-20· cited 43×
• York v. Bailey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-03-24· cited 31×
• Emmert v. No Problem Harry, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-09-03· cited 23×
• Miller v. CC Meisel Co., Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-08-07· cited 23×
• Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-07-27· cited 14×
• Hazelwood Water District v. First Union Management, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-03-12· cited 13×
• Hoekstre v. Golden B. Products, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-12-26· cited 12×
• Langfus, Inc. v. Queirolo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-09-07· cited 8×
• Abbott v. Oregon Holdings, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-06-10· cited 3×