Abbott v. Oregon Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the court could not meaningfully review assignment of error where exhibits were submitted without related explanatory testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• York v. Bailey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-03-24· cited 31×
• Farhang v. Kariminaser
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-09-02· cited 6×
• Barnett v. City of Salem
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-10· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• King City Realty, Inc. v. Sunpace Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-09-16· cited 24×
• Universal Ideas Corp. v. Esty
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-03-25· cited 12×
• Watts v. Lane County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-08-07· cited 5×
• Grant County v. Arcanum Institute, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-07-31· cited 3×