Skip to main content
· 9/3/2008

Emmert v. No Problem Harry, Inc.

Citations

  • 192 P.3d 844
  • 222 Or. App. 151
  • 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Consideration is defined as some right, interest, profit, or benefit to the promisor * * * or some forbearance, detriment, loss, or responsibility given, suffered, or undertaking by the promissee [.]”
  • counterclaims for conversion and intentional interference with economic relations tried to the court
  • “Plaintiff in this case prayed for prejudgment interest and specified in both the prayer and the body of its amended complaint the amount it claimed it was due exclusive of interest — $220,411.00—and the dates during which it was deprived of that sum — 'as of May 1, 2002.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.