Farhang v. Kariminaser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he appellant *** has the burden to demonstrate that error; it is not the respondent’s burden to show that the trial court did not err.”
• it is appellant’s burden to provide the appellate court with a record adequate to demonstrate trial court error
• “[T]he trial court could have awarded prejudgment interest only if there were no disputed facts after the jury returned its verdict, and the court could have easily calculated the prejudgment interest based on the undisputed facts.” (Emphasis added.)
• lack of ascertainability is a dispositive issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Frakes v. Nay
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-19· cited 26×
• Quick Collect, Inc. v. Higgins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-08-21· cited 12×
• JH Kelly, LLC v. Quality Plus Services, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-22· cited 12×
• Patton v. Mut. of Enumclaw Ins. Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-02-27· cited 8×
• Spaid v. 4-R Equipment, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-12· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hoekstre v. Golden B. Products, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-12-26· cited 12×
• Langfus, Inc. v. Queirolo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-09-07· cited 8×
• Farhang v. Kariminaser
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-09-02· cited 6×

Other cases named Farhang v. Kariminaser

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Farhang v. Kariminaser
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-09-02· cited 6×