Skip to main content
· 12/9/2009

Farhang v. Kariminaser

Citations

  • 222 P.3d 712
  • 232 Or. App. 353
  • 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1957

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he appellant *** has the burden to demonstrate that error; it is not the respondent’s burden to show that the trial court did not err.”
  • it is appellant’s burden to provide the appellate court with a record adequate to demonstrate trial court error
  • “[T]he trial court could have awarded prejudgment interest only if there were no disputed facts after the jury returned its verdict, and the court could have easily calculated the prejudgment interest based on the undisputed facts.” (Emphasis added.)
  • lack of ascertainability is a dispositive issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Wollheim, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.