Supreme Court· 12/5/1932
Ex Parte United States
Citations
- 287 U.S. 241
- 53 S. Ct. 129
- 77 L. Ed. 283
- 1932 U.S. LEXIS 16
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- return of true bill of indictment “conclusively determines the existence of probable cause for the purpose of holding the accused to answer”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sutherland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
152 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,120×
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 999×
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court· 1953-11-30· cited 826×
- De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 810×
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1992-05-04· cited 730×
- Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court· 1978-12-18· cited 640×
- Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-03-19· cited 557×
- Kaley v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2014-02-25· cited 531×
- Geoffrey M. Radvansky v. City of Olmsted FallsSixth Circuit· 2005-01-14· cited 520×
- Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 490×
- Will v. Calvert Fire InsuranceSupreme Court· 1978-06-23· cited 472×
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court· 2010-01-13· cited 433×
- United States v. CoxFifth Circuit· 1965-01-26· cited 382×
- Ex Parte Republic of PeruSupreme Court· 1943-04-05· cited 365×
- Moore v. HartmanD.C. Circuit· 2009-07-07· cited 345×
- Campbell v. City of San AntonioFifth Circuit· 1995-01-19· cited 314×
- Newman v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1967-07-31· cited 212×
- Chandler v. Judicial Council of the Tenth CircuitSupreme Court· 1970-06-29· cited 201×
- Gary L. Higgason, M.D. v. Robert F. StephensSixth Circuit· 2002-05-01· cited 172×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court· 1916-12-04· cited 540×
- McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court· 1927-01-17· cited 449×
- United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 169×
- Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. MorrisEighth Circuit· 1904-10-24· cited 115×
- Jackson Ex Dem. Astor v. CraneSupreme Court· 1831-03-18· cited 111×
- Los Angeles Brush Manufacturing Corp. v. JamesSupreme Court· 1927-01-03· cited 92×
- Morse v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-02-02· cited 61×
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. RellstabSupreme Court· 1928-01-16· cited 44×
- Ex Parte AbduSupreme Court· 1918-05-20· cited 19×
- Fetters v. United States Ex Rel. CunninghamSupreme Court· 1931-05-25· cited 19×
- In Re GlaserSupreme Court· 1905-05-08· cited 8×
- Ex parte Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court· 1932-05-23· cited 7×
- In re Apex Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1927-06-06· cited 3×
- Ex parte DaughertySupreme Court· 1931-01-12· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.