Skip to main content
· 5/20/1918

Ex Parte Abdu

Citations

  • 247 U.S. 27
  • 38 S. Ct. 447
  • 62 L. Ed. 966
  • 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1955

Syllabus

<p>In a case ultimately within its reviewing power, this court has jurisdiction to require by mandamus the filing of the record in the Circuit Court of Appeals.</p> <p>Where the refusal to file was in accordance with orders of the Court of Appeals, relied on in the clerk’s answer, held that, while properly the relief should have been directed to the court,- under the peculiar circumstances the irregularity might be treated as formal and the authority to make the orders be determined with the clerk alone as technical respondent.</p> <p>The provision in the. Act of June 12, 1917, c. 27, 40 Stat. 157, that “courts of the United States shall be open to seamen, without furnishing bonds or prepayment of or making, deposit to secure fees or costs, for the purpose of entering and prosecuting suit,” etc., does not apply to appellate proceedings.</p> <p>Rile discharged.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • right to proceed IFP not absolute, but dependent on exercise of discretion by appellate court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Brandeis, Clarke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.