Supreme Court· 12/18/1978

Michigan v. Doran

Citations

439 U.S. 282
99 S. Ct. 530
58 L. Ed. 2d 521
1978 U.S. LEXIS 147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that asylum state must accept probable-cause determination made by demanding state
in extradition hearing, presumption of regularity insulates demanding state’s probable cause determination from review in asylum state
in criminal matters, concept of full faith and credit is articulated through Extradition Clause, U.S. Const. art. IV, § 2, cl. 2
in extradition proceedings, rendering state may rely on probable cause determination of demanding state
inquiry in a habeas corpus challenge to extradition proceeding
an extradition proceeding determines: (a) whether the extradition documents on their face are in order; (b) whether the petitioner has been charged with a crime in the demanding state; (c) whether the petitioner is the person named in the request for extradition; and (d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buegek, Burger, Stewart, White, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens, Blackmun, Brennan, Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

498 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Michigan v. Doran

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.