Kaley v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the “generally sound premise” that “the adversarial process leads to better, more accurate decision-making”
• holding that the United States has no obligation to \give the defendant knowledge of the Government's case and strategy well before the rules of criminal procedure - or principles of due process ... would otherwise require\
• noting that to issue an indictment, a grand jury must find probable cause to believe a defendant committed the charged offense
• explaining that “an indictment fair upon its face, and returned by a properly constituted grand jury . . . conclusively determines the existence of probable cause to believe the defendant perpetrated the offense alleged”
• noting that lower courts allow a defendant to challenge “whether proba- ble cause exists to believe that the assets in dispute are traceable or otherwise sufficiently related to the crime charged in the indict- ment”
• explaining further that probable cause is defined as a \fair probability\ upon which \reasonable and prudent people . . . act\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).