Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 7/7/2009

Moore v. Hartman

Citations

  • 571 F.3d 62
  • 387 U.S. App. D.C. 62
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14942
  • 2009 WL 1930185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming and collecting cases from many districts determining an indictment constitutes prima facie evidence of probable cause in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971
  • a non-moving party must show that \sufficient evidence supporting the claimed factual dispute\ exists such that a jury or judge must \resolve the parties' differing versions of the truth at trial\
  • a non-moving party must show that \sufficient evidence supporting the claimed factual dispute\ exists such that a jury or judge must \resolve the parties' differing versions of the truth at trial\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.