Skip to main content

Watson v. State

Citations

  • 604 S.E.2d 804
  • 278 Ga. 763
  • 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 3591
  • 2004 Ga. LEXIS 999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the question of relevance is entrusted to a trial court’s discretion and holding: “The proffered evidence in this case was too threadbare to be admissible.”
  • holding that the question of relevance is entrusted to a trial court’s discretion and holding: “The proffered evidence in this case was too threadbare to be admissible.”
  • holding that the question of relevance is entrusted to a trial court’s discretion and holding: “The proffered evidence in this case was too threadbare to be admissible.”
  • holding that an issue was not adequately preserved where defendant filed a motion in limine, trial court did not issue a pretrial ruling, and defendant did not object until after the problematic testimony had concluded
  • finding that an unavailable witness’ statements to close friends were not testimonial in nature, so the statements were not subject to a Crawford analysis
  • admitting hearsay testimony despite the victim’s inconsistent statements about a broken arm when there was a logical explanation for the inconsistencies and the victim never recanted her reports of abuse by the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.