Evans v. Midland Funding LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in an FDCPA credit-card debt case \that the allegations in the state court complaints at issue here were not false insofar as they sought recovery `for money loaned'\
• holding in an FDCPA credit-card debt case “that the allegations in the state court complaints at issue here were not false insofar as they sought recovery ‘for money loaned’ ”
• explaining that “creditors or agencies who regularly engage in the practice of collecting consumer debts are suppliers engaged in consumer transactions” under the OCSPA
• explaining that “creditors or agencies who regularly engage in the practice of collecting consumer debts are suppliers engaged in consumer transactions” under the OCSPA
• denying judgment on the pleadings for the defendant on a claim that an attempt to collect a nonexistent debt violated § 1692e(2) and (10)
• finding same transaction or occurrence where the defendant law firm “filed substantially similar complaints” against plaintiffs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).