Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 1/14/1992

Gary Smith v. Transworld Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 953 F.2d 1025
  • 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1424
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 410
  • 1992 WL 3392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the “bona fide error” defense does not re- quire a collector to conduct an independent investigation of the debt referred for collection
  • holding that the contents of a collection letter were not misleading, even under the “least sophisticated consumer” standard
  • agreeing with the trial court that the FDCPA did not require an “independent investigation of [a] debt referred for collection”
  • finding bona fide error because collection letter sent a day after debt collector received request to cease communication pursuant to 1692c(c) was a “clerical error” due to stop order and collection letter “crossing in the mail”
  • “[T]he Sixth Circuit has recognized that the FDCPA does not require an independent investigation of the debt referred for collection.”
  • “Because Transworld ceased collection activities after the receipt of Smith’s cease and desist letter, see supra (Transworld’s second collection letter resulted from a bona fide error), Transworld did not violate the provisions of 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krupansky, Milburn, Contie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

122 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.