Guzman v. Denny's Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• basing its holding that § 2000a-3(c) does not apply to Title III of the ADA on the doctrine expressio unius est exclusio alter ius
• “To hold that the entirety of § 2000a-3 is adopted is to impermissibly render superfluous the explicit textual reference to § 2000a-3(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).