Richard A. Bower v. Federal Express Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ambiguity in one part of a statute is not cause to narrow or expand the plain meaning of a term found elsewhere in the statute
• holding that an ambiguity in one part of a statute is not cause to narrow or expand the plain meaning of a term found elsewhere in the statute
• holding that an ambiguity in one part of a statute is not cause to narrow or expand the plain meaning of a term found elsewhere in the statute
• noting that when a court considers a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), “[a]ll allegations must be construed in die light most favorable to the plaintiff.”
• “We must treat as true all of the well-pleaded allegations of the complaint.” (emphasis added)
• “We must treat as true all of the well-pleaded allegations of the complaint.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).