Skip to main content
· 10/9/2003

Duane Montgomery v. Huntington Bank and Silver Shadow Recovery, Inc.

Citations

  • 346 F.3d 693
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20596
  • 2003 WL 22330919

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “pro se complaint must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers”
  • concluding that a bank which originated a car loan was not “a ‘debt collector’ subject to liability under the FDCPA”
  • noting that the FTC’s interpretations of the FDCPA can help “shed light on the statute’s meaning”
  • stating that a “pro se complaint must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers”
  • holding whether the defendants fall under the FDCPA definition of a “debt collector” is a “threshold matter”
  • stating that the statutory definition of debt collector “does not include the consumer’s creditors” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Siler, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.