· 10/9/2003
Duane Montgomery v. Huntington Bank and Silver Shadow Recovery, Inc.
Citations
- 346 F.3d 693
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20596
- 2003 WL 22330919
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a “pro se complaint must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers”
- concluding that a bank which originated a car loan was not “a ‘debt collector’ subject to liability under the FDCPA”
- noting that the FTC’s interpretations of the FDCPA can help “shed light on the statute’s meaning”
- stating that a “pro se complaint must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers”
- holding whether the defendants fall under the FDCPA definition of a “debt collector” is a “threshold matter”
- stating that the statutory definition of debt collector “does not include the consumer’s creditors” (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boggs, Siler, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.