Skip to main content
· 10/13/1992

Evans v. Dunston (In Re Dunston)

Citations

  • 146 B.R. 269
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16674
  • 1992 WL 293289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the standard used in Colorado mirrors that used in the Tenth Circuit under In re Wallace
  • \The false representation must be sufficiently material to have caused the plaintiff to act where she would not have done so had she known the truth\
  • “Unlike false representations, which are express misrepresentations, false pretenses include conduct and material omissions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.