United States v. Charles E. Mayberry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that imposing a federal assessment on those convicted of assimilative crimes would violate the fundamental policy of the Assimilative Crimes Act
• holding that imposing a federal assessment on those convicted of assimilative crimes would violate the fundamental policy of the Assimilative Crimes Act
• holding that the imposition of a special assessment under 18 U.S.C. § 3013 to offset the costs of a victims’ assistance fund was a form of punishment within the meaning of the Assimilative Crimes Act
• the word “punishment” has been given a “broad and inclusive meaning” in cases interpreting the Assimilative Crimes Act
• the word \punishment\ has been given a \broad and inclusive meaning\ in cases interpreting the Assimilative Crimes Act
• the special assessment set forth in § 3013 is punishment for purposes of the Assimilative Crimes Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).