· 10/8/1996
Farraj v. Soliz (In Re Soliz)
Citations
- 201 B.R. 363
- 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 1322
- 1996 WL 600817
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Since all of the material facts which form the basis for non-dischargeability are pleaded in the complaint, an invocation of a different statute than that mentioned in the complaint does not constitute an amendment of the complaint”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adlai S. Hardin, Jr.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.