Skip to main content
· 10/8/1996

Farraj v. Soliz (In Re Soliz)

Citations

  • 201 B.R. 363
  • 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 1322
  • 1996 WL 600817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Since all of the material facts which form the basis for non-dischargeability are pleaded in the complaint, an invocation of a different statute than that mentioned in the complaint does not constitute an amendment of the complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adlai S. Hardin, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.