Skip to main content
· 4/29/1996

Sterna v. Paneras (In Re Paneras)

Citations

  • 195 B.R. 395
  • 1996 WL 248767

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the separate mention of support payments in a marital settlement agreement indicates that other obligations are not for support
  • noting that the termination of an obligation upon the death or remarriage of either spouse indicates the obligation was for support
  • noting that fact that payments were thought to be taxable indicate the payments were for support
  • considering heading in marital settlement agreement under which obligation appears as one factor in determining obligation’s nature
  • economic benefit to debtor outweighed detriment to non-debtor spouse because underlying obligations were satisfied and paid out of the closing proceeds from the sale of the former residence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John H. Squires

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.