Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 12/20/2013
Espina v. Prince George's County
Citations
- 215 Md. App. 611
- 82 A.3d 1240
- 2013 WL 6694383
- 2013 Md. App. LEXIS 170
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiff could recover for an Article 24 claim even though the jury had found that a police officer was not guilty of assaulting the victim
- finding sufficient evidence to support a jury verdict of actual malice to preclude officer from invoking statutory immunity, where evidence showed that police officer attacked victim unprovoked, shooting and killing him when he was “unable to resist or fight back”
- finding sufficient evidence to support a jury verdict of actual malice to preclude officer from invoking statutory immunity, where evidence showed that police officer attacked victim unprovoked, shooting and killing him when he was “unable to resist or fight back”
- “The County asserts that, as a matter of law, the Espinas’ Article 24 claim should not have been submitted to the jury because such a claim can only be asserted via an Article 26 claim. We disagree.”
- evidence of two prior incidents where the defendant officer was involved in violent encounters with members of the public was admissible to show motive, intent, and modus operandi, as well as to rebut officer’s testimony regarding his use of force
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Espina v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-03-30· cited 53×
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-27· cited 20×
- Holloway-Johnson v. BeallCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-11-25· cited 19×
- Johnson v. FrancisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-11-28· cited 18×
- Brooks v. JenkinsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-12-16· cited 15×
- Francis v. JohnsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-10-06· cited 14×
- In the Matter of DoryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-12-23· cited 7×
- Prince George's County v. MoralesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-11-30· cited 5×
- Bolling v. Bay Country Consumer FinanceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-07-01
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 16,485×
- Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-12-18· cited 571×
- Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-30· cited 272×
- Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-01-12· cited 244×
- DiPino v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-05-11· cited 240×
- Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-02-07· cited 192×
- Okwa v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-07-28· cited 191×
- Lee v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-12-13· cited 159×
- Shoemaker v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-03-10· cited 112×
- Hines v. FrenchCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-07-02· cited 107×
- Leese v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-09-09· cited 96×
- O'CONNOR v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-07-26· cited 93×
- Prince George's County v. LongtinCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-25· cited 90×
- Southern Management Corp. v. TahaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-11-25· cited 80×
- Thacker v. City of HyattsvilleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-11-14· cited 71×
- Ruffin Hotel Corp. v. GasperCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-03-21· cited 69×
- Thomas v. City of AnnapolisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-01-31· cited 63×
- Franklin v. Mazda Motor Corp.D. Maryland· 1989-02-02· cited 62×
- Hansen v. City of LaurelCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-15· cited 59×
- Housing Authority v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-06· cited 54×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.