Lockshin v. Semsker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that statutes are interpreted to avoid results that are “absurd, illogical, or incompatible with common sense”
• recognizing that statutes are interpreted to avoid results that are “absurd, illogical, or incompatible with common sense”
• recognizing that statutes are interpreted to avoid results that are “absurd, illogical, or incompatible with common sense”
• explaining that “we seek to reconcile and harmonize the parts of a statute, to the extent possible consistent with the statute’s object and scope”
• explaining that “the plain language must be viewed within the context of the statutory scheme to which it belongs[]” (citations omitted)
• explaining that “the plain language must be viewed within the context of the statutory scheme to which it belongs[]” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).