Erwin v. Cotter Health Centers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that 7 there is only an actual conflict if Washington law compels a different result than the law 8 of the other state
• explaining that the definition of \real estate broker\ is a question of law, but the details of the real estate broker's conduct is a question of fact
• explaining that the definition of “real estate broker” is a question of law, but the details of the real estate broker’s conduct is a question of fact
• application of law to the facts of a case is a question of law reviewed de novo
• application of law to the facts of a case is a question of law reviewed de novo
• where choice-of-law provision 23 selected Washington law, concluding that a conflict existed with California law but enforcing 24 provision anyway after choice-of-law analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).