Washington Supreme Court· 7/1/2004

Jones v. Jones

Citations

152 Wash. 2d 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that one provision's permission for removal only for '\reasons specified'\ in a second provision incorporated the second provision's catchall phrase '\for any other cause or reason which to the court appears necessary'\
holding that one provision’s permission for removal only for “ ‘reasons specified’ ” in a second provision incorporated the second provision’s catchall phrase “ ‘for any other cause or reason which to the court appears necessary’ ” (emphasis omitted
explaining the standard of review to analyze a trial court’s removal of a trustee for breach
personal representative/beneficiary of a will ordered to pay other beneficiaries' attorney fees personally \because the litigation was necessitated by his multiple breaches of fiduciary duty\ to those beneficiaries
“Under RCW 11.04.250, the title to land vests to devisees at the time of the devisor’s death.”
“Further, RCW 11.96A.150 allows costs in probate cases to any party, from any party, and is not limited by RCW 11.68.070.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Owens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Jones v. Jones

821 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.