· 7/7/1994
Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.
Citations
- 875 P.2d 1213
- 124 Wash. 2d 205
- 1994 Wash. LEXIS 395
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “statutes of repose are to be treated not as statutes of limitation, but as part of the body of a state's substantive law in making choice-of-law determinations”
- holding Oregon law extinction of failure to warn claims obviates need to decide FIFRA preemption issue
- stating that “Washington has adopted the ‘most significant relationship test’ ” and applying the Restatement factors
- finding that the injury begins when the latently developing disease is detected
- adopting Restatement § 145 to apply to cases involving rights and liabilities in torts
- adopting Restatement § 145 to apply to cases involving rights and liabilities in torts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brachtenbach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.