Skip to main content
· 7/7/1994

Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.

Citations

  • 875 P.2d 1213
  • 124 Wash. 2d 205
  • 1994 Wash. LEXIS 395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “statutes of repose are to be treated not as statutes of limitation, but as part of the body of a state's substantive law in making choice-of-law determinations”
  • holding Oregon law extinction of failure to warn claims obviates need to decide FIFRA preemption issue
  • stating that “Washington has adopted the ‘most significant relationship test’ ” and applying the Restatement factors
  • finding that the injury begins when the latently developing disease is detected
  • adopting Restatement § 145 to apply to cases involving rights and liabilities in torts
  • adopting Restatement § 145 to apply to cases involving rights and liabilities in torts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brachtenbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.