Skip to main content
· 10/20/1986

Consul Limited, Kenneth B. Wilson Dba Ken Wilson Associates v. Solide Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, and Hrh Operating Company, a Corporation

Citations

  • 802 F.2d 1143
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court erred in 23 dismissing for failure to state a claim where the conflict in 24 language of an agreement “leaves doubt as to the parties’ 25 intent”
  • finding that where the 5 language “leaves doubt as to the parties’ intent,” the motion to dismiss must be denied
  • reaching conclusion based on California statutes’ use of “within this state” language and comprehensive review of foreign authority
  • interpreting contract terms to determine whether the contract violated a statute and contrasting plaintiff's tort claims arising from the potentially illegal contract
  • finding a substantial relationship sufficient to “honor a choice-of-law 10 provision” when “one of the parties resides in the chosen state”
  • the substantial relationship test is met if one of the parties resides in the selected state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Tang, Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.