Skip to main content
· 8/26/1996

Ito International Corp. v. Prescott, Inc.

Citations

  • 921 P.2d 566
  • 83 Wash. App. 282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting choice-of-law clause where statute expressly declared the substantive provision at issue void
  • whether a \contract's choice-of-law provision is invalid . . . is a question of law that we review de novo.\
  • whether a “contract’s choice-of-law provision is invalid ... is a question of law that we review de novo”
  • choice of law provision that would allow defendant to avoid compliance with the Securities Act will not be enforced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.