Eric Martin v. William Overton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even pro se litigants must comply with the basic procedural requirements for bringing civil claims
• holding that even pro se litigants must comply with the basic procedural requirements for bringing civil claims
• holding that district court should have dismissed petitioner’s § 2241 petition without prejudice to allow him to raise civil rights claims properly under § 1983
• holding that even pro se litigants must comply with the basic procedural requirements for bringing civil claims
• concluding that the Castro notice-and-warning requirement applies to \petitions recharacterized as § 2254 petitions\
• holding that the district court should dismiss an improperly-filed § 2241 petition without prejudice to allow the petitioner to re-file his claims in a civil rights case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).