United States v. Quentin Miller, A/K/A \Q\ Quentin Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court “should advise the petitioner that he can (1) have his motion ruled upon as filed; (2
• holding that to avoid the statute’s procedural bars, “petitioners must marshal in one § 2255 writ all the arguments they have to collaterally attack their convictions.”
• stating that § 2255 provides federal prisoners a means by which to bring collateral attacks challenging the validity of their judgment and sentence
• stating that § 2255 provides federal prisoners a means by which to bring collateral attacks challenging the validity of their judgment and sentence
• stating that § 2255 provides federal prisoners a means by which to bring collateral attacks challenging the validity of their judgment and sentence
• stating that § 2255 provides federal prisoners a means by which to bring collateral attacks challenging the validity of their judgment and sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).