James Luedtke v. David Berkebile

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 1983 is the correct vehicle for a prisoner to challenge conditions of confinement
• reviewing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241
• upholding summary dismissal of § 2241 filed by federal pretrial detainee to the extent it challenged various conditions of his pretrial detention
• dismissing ' 2241 petition without prejudice to the petitioner filing a civil rights action
• “[C]onditions of confinement claims seeking relief in the form of improvement of prison conditions . . . are not properly brought under § 2241.”
• “The district court properly dismissed without prejudice [petitioner’s] first three claims because § 2241 is not the proper vehicle for a prisoner to challenge conditions of confinement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).