Boutwell v. Keating

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because Oklahoma’s parole system is entirely discretionary, Oklahoma has not created a liberty interest in parole protect-able by the Due Process Clause
• observing that the district court “acted within its discretion by applying the Section 2254 Rules to [a] § 2241 petition”
• noting that district court acted within its discretion in applying Habeas Rule 4 to § 2241 petition
• holding the district court acted within its discretion by applying the Section 2254 Rules to a § 2241 petition
• holding the district court acted within its discretion by applying Section 2254 Rules to a section 2241 petition
• finding that the district court “acted within its discretion by applying the Section 2254 Rules to this § 2241 petition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).