Skip to main content
· 12/16/1991

James M. Jourdan, Jr. v. John Jabe and L. Boyd

Citations

  • 951 F.2d 108
  • 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 340
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 29383
  • 1991 WL 263473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pro se litigants are not to be accorded any special consideration when they fail to comply with straight-forward procedural requirements and deadlines
  • recognizing that a pro se litigant is not afforded special consideration for failure to follow readily comprehended court orders
  • holding that a pro se litigant has an affirmative duty to diligently pursue the prosecution of his cause of action
  • recognizing that a pro se litigant is not afforded special consideration for failure to follow easily understandable court orders
  • holding that even pro se litigants are not to be accorded any special consideration when they fail to adhere to readily-comprehended discovery deadlines
  • holding that a pro se litigant has an affirmative duty to diligently pursue the prosecution of his cause of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Norris, Timbers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.