Allen Engineering Corporation v. Bartell Industries, Inc. And Darragh Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that amounts to be paid are relevant in considering whether transaction is purely commercial
• holding that findings of fact from a bench trial are reviewed for clear error
• holding that claims that contradicted the specification were invalid as indefinite
• holding that claims that contradicted the specification were invalid as indefinite
• stating that “the number of embodiments disclosed in the specification is not determinative of the meaning of disputed claim terms”
• explaining that copying “is of no import on the question of whether the claims of an issued patent are infringed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).