Marctec, LLC v. Johnson & Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the patentee misrepresented both the law of claim construction and the constructions ultimately adopted by the court
• holding it was litigation misconduct for a plaintiff to “persistí ] in advancing unfounded arguments that unnecessarily extended [the] litigation,” and that plaintiff’s “decision to continue the litigation after claim construction” supported the exceptional case finding
• finding a claim con- struction position objectively baseless where “no reason- able application of the principles enunciated in Phillips . . . supports its position”
• affirming the district court’s exceptionality finding where the plaintiff “misrepresented … the constructions ultimately adopted by the court”
• discussing exclusion of expert testimony that “ignored the court’s claim construction” as “inadmissible under Daubert”
• discussing exclusion of expert testimony that “ignored the court’s claim construction” as “inadmissible under Daubert”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Sfa Systems, LLC v. Newegg Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2015-07-10· cited 94×
• Taurus IP, LLC v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2013-08-09· cited 80×
• Skyline Steel, LLC v. PilePro, LLC
  S.D. New York· 2015-04-24· cited 68×
• Highmark, Inc. v. Allcare Health Management Systems, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-08-07· cited 47×
• Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. 02 Micro International Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2013-08-13· cited 45×
• Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2013-12-26· cited 32×
• Adjustacam, LLC v. Newegg, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2017-07-05· cited 29×
• Raylon, LLC v. Complus Data Innovations, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-12-07· cited 24×
• Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Company
  Federal Circuit· 2014-03-12· cited 18×
• Integrated Technology Corp. v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2013-11-04· cited 16×
• Highmark, Inc. v. Allcare Health Management Systems, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-12-06· cited 15×
• Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corp.
  N.D. California· 2015-03-11· cited 12×
• Synthes USA, LLC v. Spinal Kinetics, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2013-10-29· cited 10×
• SRI International, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2017-06-01· cited 10×
• Sociedad Espanola de Electromedicina y Calidad, S.A. v. Blue Ridge X-Ray Co.
  W.D. North Carolina· 2016-12-28· cited 8×
• Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. Sharp Corp.
  N.D. Illinois· 2014-05-30· cited 6×
• General Protecht Group, Inc. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.
  D. New Mexico· 2015-08-03· cited 6×
• Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2015-09-04· cited 5×
• Boston Scientific Corp. v. Cordis Corp.
  D. Delaware· 2012-03-13· cited 5×
• Layne Christensen Co. v. Bro-Tech Corp.
  D. Kansas· 2012-05-16· cited 4×

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
• Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 6,250×
• Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2006-02-21· cited 3,273×
• Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1998-03-25· cited 1,536×
• Multiform Desiccants, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Medzam, Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 1998-01-15· cited 323×
• Brooks Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. v. Dutailier International, Inc. And Dutailier, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2005-01-04· cited 140×
• Computer Docking Station Corp. v. Dell, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-03-21· cited 122×
• Forest Laboratories, Inc. And Ony, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, and Tokyo Tanabe Company, Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2003-08-07· cited 101×
• Eon-Net LP v. Flagstar Bancorp
  Federal Circuit· 2011-07-29· cited 83×
• Amsted Industries Incorporated v. Buckeye Steel Castings Company
  Federal Circuit· 1994-04-18· cited 76×
• Eltech Systems Corporation and Oxytech Systems, Inc. v. Ppg Industries, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1990-05-10· cited 69×
• iLOR, LLC v. Google, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2011-01-11· cited 57×
• Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Clariti Eyewear, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-05-24· cited 48×
• Medtronic Navigation, Inc. v. Brainlab Medizinische Computersysteme GMBH
  Federal Circuit· 2010-04-26· cited 45×
• Serio-US Industries, Inc. v. Plastic Recovery Technologies Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2006-08-10· cited 43×
• Digeo, Inc. v. Audible, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2007-11-01· cited 40×
• Netcraft Corp. v. eBay, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-12-09· cited 39×
• Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-12-08· cited 34×
• Old Reliable Wholesale, Inc. v. Cornell Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2011-03-16· cited 30×
• Wedgetail, Ltd. v. Huddleston Deluxe, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-08-12· cited 16×

Other cases named Marctec, LLC v. Johnson & Johnson

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• MARCTEC, LLC v. Johnson & Johnson
  S.D. Illinois· 2009-06-15· cited 3×