Court of Appeals of Maryland· 12/18/2002
Edmonds v. State
Citations
- 812 A.2d 1034
- 372 Md. 314
- 2002 Md. LEXIS 956
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial judge acted improperly by not making a clear finding of pretext under step three
- noting that it was unclear whether the judge found the explanation credible as he first stated he did not buy the explanation, but later stated the explanation could be legitimate
- noting that it was unclear whether the judge found the explanation credible as he first stated he did not buy the explanation, but later stated the explanation could be legitimate
- ordering a remand because under two years had lapsed after the original trial concluded
- challenge pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986)
- “Sometimes the record is adequate for a reviewing court to find that the trial judge implicitly ruled on” a predicate fact
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-18· cited 99×
- Peters v. Early Healthcare Giver, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-13· cited 64×
- Montgomery Mutual Insurance v. ChessonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-05-23· cited 34×
- Ray-Simmons & McGouldrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-02-22· cited 12×
- Church v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-05-13· cited 7×
- Elliott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-06-01· cited 6×
- Spencer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-11-29· cited 6×
- People v. BellMichigan Court of Appeals· 2004-02-19· cited 4×
- State v. TejadaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-26· cited 1×
- Collini v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-02-24· cited 1×
- Gantt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-06-04· cited 1×
- State of Arizona v. Dwandarrius Jamar RobinsonArizona Supreme Court· 2022-05-24· cited 1×
- Pietruszewski v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-04-07· cited 1×
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-09-10
- Hart v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-02-28
- Hare v. David S. Brown EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2025-07-28
Cites
60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-03-08· cited 3,183×
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court· 1995-05-15· cited 3,008×
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 2,917×
- Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 1,327×
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1892-12-05· cited 760×
- People v. GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-10-02· cited 417×
- United States v. Leo BishopNinth Circuit· 1992-03-25· cited 356×
- United States v. Daniel Chalan, Jr.Tenth Circuit· 1987-03-03· cited 281×
- United States v. Sandra Vaccaro, John Vaccaro, Michael Brennan, Paul Bond, Norman Alvis, Stephen Labarbera, Dorothy Snider, and William CushingNinth Circuit· 1987-04-29· cited 167×
- United States v. Horacio AlvaradoSecond Circuit· 1991-01-16· cited 162×
- Flanders Jordan v. Eugene S. LefevreSecond Circuit· 2000-05-08· cited 153×
- Klauenberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-25· cited 143×
- State v. GivensSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2001-01-17· cited 136×
- Danny Jones v. Harold Plaster, Sheriff, in His Individual and Official CapacitiesFourth Circuit· 1995-06-22· cited 125×
- United States v. Michael L. JohnsonTenth Circuit· 1991-08-15· cited 123×
- Edwin Galarza v. John P. Keane, Sing Sing Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 2001-06-08· cited 100×
- People v. HooperIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-12-07· cited 99×
- Stanley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-07-01· cited 98×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.