Supreme Court· 2/22/2000
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Thomas
Citations
- 528 U.S. 1161
- 120 S. Ct. 1174
- 145 L. Ed. 2d 1082
- 68 U.S.L.W. 3533
- 2000 U.S. LEXIS 1122
- 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1888
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding failure to admonish defendant on his statutory duty to register as sex offender did not invalidate guilty plea
- holding failure to admonish defendant on his statutory duty to register as sex offender did not invalidate guilty plea
- holding failure to admonish defendant on his statutory duty to register as sex offender did not invalidate guilty plea
- “Although it uses the label ‘plus,’ the First Circuit’s ‘pretext plus’ standard does not necessarily require the introduction of additional evidence beyond that required to show pretext.”
- the stereotypic assumption that \women are not aggressive\ along with other “more subtle cognitive phenomena” may infect decision-making
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R. Wireless Corp.First Circuit· 2000-07-07· cited 849×
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-04-04· cited 834×
- Feliciano De La Cruz v. El Conquistador Resort & Country ClubFirst Circuit· 2000-07-28· cited 232×
- Reed v. Lepage Bakeries, Inc.First Circuit· 2001-04-05· cited 198×
- Claire A. Straughn v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.First Circuit· 2001-12-05· cited 187×
- Cummings v. HPG International, Inc.First Circuit· 2001-03-22· cited 118×
- David B. Fite v. Digital Equipment CorporationFirst Circuit· 2000-11-13· cited 116×
- O'Neill v. CarlisleFirst Circuit· 2000-04-12· cited 99×
- Collins v. NuzzoFirst Circuit· 2001-04-10· cited 77×
- Keeler v. Putnam Fiduciary Trust Co.First Circuit· 2001-01-17· cited 68×
- United States v. San Juan Bay MarinaFirst Circuit· 2001-02-21· cited 61×
- Newberne v. DEPT. OF CRIME CONTROLSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2005-08-19· cited 54×
- Gelabert-Ladenheim v. American Airlines, Inc.First Circuit· 2001-06-12· cited 46×
- Vollemans v. Town of WallingfordConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-08-14· cited 40×
- Home Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceFirst Circuit· 2000-10-11· cited 38×
- Fisher v. TrainorFirst Circuit· 2001-03-07· cited 38×
- Bolinger v. Bell AtlanticNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-04-27· cited 34×
- Thompson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-10-17· cited 31×
- Shepherd v. Hunterdon Dev. Ctr.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-01-18· cited 29×
- Laurenzano v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc. Retirement Income TrustD. Massachusetts· 2001-03-27· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.