Skip to main content
· 8/19/2005

Newberne v. DEPT. OF CRIME CONTROL

Citations

  • 618 S.E.2d 201
  • 359 N.C. 782
  • 23 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 635
  • 2005 N.C. LEXIS 835

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff reported to his supervisor that fellow troopers exercised gross abuse of authority in the apprehension and arrest of a suspect
  • dismissal is proper when face of complaint reveals no law to support its claim, absence of facts to make it a sufficient claim, or discloses some fact necessary to defeat the claim
  • \A motion to dismiss under N.C.R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) `is the usual and proper method of testing the legal sufficiency of the complaint.'\ (quoting Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 98, 176 S.E.2d 161, 163 (1970))
  • “A motion to dismiss under N.C. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) ‘is the usual and proper method of testing the legal sufficiency of the complaint.’ ” (quoting Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 98, 176 S.E.2d 161, 163 (1970))
  • applying North Carolina Whistleblower Act, N.C.G.S. § 126-84 to -88

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.