· 8/19/2005
Newberne v. DEPT. OF CRIME CONTROL
Citations
- 618 S.E.2d 201
- 359 N.C. 782
- 23 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 635
- 2005 N.C. LEXIS 835
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiff reported to his supervisor that fellow troopers exercised gross abuse of authority in the apprehension and arrest of a suspect
- dismissal is proper when face of complaint reveals no law to support its claim, absence of facts to make it a sufficient claim, or discloses some fact necessary to defeat the claim
- \A motion to dismiss under N.C.R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) `is the usual and proper method of testing the legal sufficiency of the complaint.'\ (quoting Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 98, 176 S.E.2d 161, 163 (1970))
- “A motion to dismiss under N.C. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) ‘is the usual and proper method of testing the legal sufficiency of the complaint.’ ” (quoting Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 98, 176 S.E.2d 161, 163 (1970))
- applying North Carolina Whistleblower Act, N.C.G.S. § 126-84 to -88
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.